Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 16 de 16
Filter
1.
Holistic Integrative Oncology ; 2(1), 2023.
Article in English | EuropePMC | ID: covidwho-20241380

ABSTRACT

Purpose or objective The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in significant healthcare implications, with care for cancer patients compromised due to resource diversion towards battling the pandemic. We aim to investigate the impact of the peak wave of the pandemic in 2020 on the delivery of cancer care in Singapore, specifically via our nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) treatment data. This study applies real world numbers to the impact of COVID-19 on cancer care delivery in Singapore. The choice of nasopharyngeal cancer allows a good direct estimate of common treatment measures such as time to biopsy, time to staging scans, time to treatment commencement, due to its clear protocol and algorithms for staging and treatment;thus serving as an excellent surrogate for the effectiveness and timeliness of the different aspects of cancer care delivery. Materials and methods In this retrospective study, we included all patients with newly diagnosed NPC from 1st January to 31st May from 2017 to 2020 at our centre. This time period was chosen as it coincided with the period in 2020 during the COVID-19 pandemic where there was the most strain on healthcare resources and the most restrictions on population movement within Singapore, which may impact on healthcare seeking behaviour. Narrowing down the time period to the first 5 months of the 4 respective years also allowed us to reduce the effect of annual seasonal variation in patient numbers seen as a result of holidays and festive periods such as the Lunar New Year and scheduled school holidays. Electronic medical records (EMR) were accessed. Only newly diagnosed NPC cases were included in our analysis. Patients with second synchronous primary malignancies or NPC disease recurrence were excluded. Data analysis was carried out using a combination of SPSS and Microsoft Excel. Results Significantly, there was a reduction of 37–46.3% in newly diagnosed NPC cases during the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic from January to end May 2020 compared to the preceding three years. Despite the reduction in numbers of newly diagnosed NPC, there was no statistically significant differences in delay from biopsy to the first radiation oncology visit and from biopsy to the first day of treatment in 2020 compared to the preceding years. All the patients treated in our centre also received the standard NPC treatment for their disease stage as per international guidelines. Conclusion We recommend a heightened awareness of the dangers of delaying cancer presentation and care in healthcare policies and resource allocation and at the same time, encourage patient's confidence in their ability to seek care. With the resurgence of new COVID-19 variants and case numbers worldwide and in Singapore, this study focuses upon the need to be aware of the exigencies of other clinical groups in resource utilization. It would be instructive to compare this study with future long term follow up to investigate the trajectory of our cancer care delivery, as well as survival outcomes.

2.
American journal of medicine open ; 2023.
Article in English | EuropePMC | ID: covidwho-2286072

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND The use of statins, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs)/angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), and anticoagulants may be associated with fewer adverse outcomes in COVID-19 patients. METHODS Nested within a cohort of 800,913 patients diagnosed with COVID-19 between 4/1/20 and 6/24/21 from the Optum COVID-19 database, three case-control studies were conducted. Cases—defined as persons who: a) were hospitalized within 30 days of COVID-19 diagnosis (n=88,405);b) were admitted to the intensive care unit [ICU]/received mechanical ventilation during COVID-19 hospitalization (n=22,147);c) died during COVID-19 hospitalization (n=2,300)—were matched 1:1 using demographic/clinical factors with controls randomly selected from a pool of patients who did not experience the case definition/event. Medication use was based on prescription ≤90 days before COVID-19 diagnosis. RESULTS Statin use was associated with decreased risk of hospitalization (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.72;95% CI, 0.69, 0.75) and ICU admission/mechanical ventilation (aOR, 0.90;95% CI, 0.84, 0.97). ACEI/ARB use was associated with decreased risk of hospitalization (aOR, 0.67;95% CI, 0.65, 0.70), ICU admission/mechanical ventilation (aOR, 0.92;95% CI, 0.86, 0.99) and death (aOR, 0.60;95% CI, 0.47, 0.78). Anticoagulant use was associated with decreased risk of hospitalization (aOR, 0.94;95% CI, 0.89, 0.99) and death (aOR, 0.56;95% CI, 0.41, 0.77). Interaction effects—in the model predicting hospitalization—were statistically significant for: statins and ACEI/ARBs (p<.0001), statins and anticoagulants (p=.003), ACEI/ARBs and anticoagulants (p<.0001). An interaction effect—in the model predicting ventilator use/ICU—was statistically significant for statins and ACEI/ARBs (p=.002). CONCLUSIONS Statins, ACEI/ARBs, and anticoagulants were associated with decreased risks of the adverse outcomes under study. These findings may provide clinically relevant information regarding potential treatment for patients with COVID-19.

3.
Am J Public Health ; 112(9): 1269-1272, 2022 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1951732

ABSTRACT

This quasi-experimental study (a community-based, physician-led human papillomavirus [HPV] education campaign and school-based vaccination program) followed 6481 students at eight Pharr-San Juan-Alamo Independent School District (Rio Grande Valley, Texas) middle schools between August 2016 and March 2021. We describe the successes and challenges experienced during the COVID-19 pandemic. HPV vaccine initiation and completion rates increased 1.29-fold and 1.47-fold, respectively, between June 2019 and March 2021. Between March 2020 and March 2021, 268 HPV vaccine doses were provided through 24 school-based interventions. Our program continued successes seen in increasing HPV vaccination rates and reducing possible HPV-associated cancers. (Am J Public Health. 2022;112(9):1269-1272. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2022.306970).


Subject(s)
Alphapapillomavirus , COVID-19 , Papillomavirus Infections , Papillomavirus Vaccines , COVID-19/prevention & control , Humans , Pandemics/prevention & control , Papillomavirus Infections/prevention & control , Papillomavirus Vaccines/therapeutic use , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Texas/epidemiology , Vaccination
4.
Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes ; 6(3): 257-268, 2022 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1864618

ABSTRACT

Objective: To describe the incidence, clinical characteristics, and factors associated with mortality in patients hospitalized for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in whom pneumothorax developed. Patients and Methods: This study was a retrospective analysis conducted using a large administrative database of adult patients hospitalized for COVID-19 in the United States from February 1, 2020, to June 10, 2021. We characterized the clinical features of patients in whom pneumothorax developed and the factors associated with mortality and stratified pneumothorax by the timing of the initiation of invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) and by the time of hospital admission (early versus late). Results: A total of 811,065 adult patients had a positive test result for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, of whom 103,858 (12.8%) were hospitalized. Pneumothorax occurred in 1915 patients (0.24% overall and 1.84% among hospitalized patients). Over time, the use of steroids and remdesivir increased, whereas the use of IMV, pneumothorax rates, and mortality decreased. The clinical characteristics associated with pneumothorax were male sex; the receipt of IMV; and treatment with steroids, remdesivir, or convalescent plasma. Most patients with pneumothorax received IMV, but pneumothorax developed before the initiation of IMV and/or early during hospitalization in majority. Multivariable analysis revealed that pneumothorax increased the risk of death (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.15; 95% CI, 1.06-1.24). In patients who did not receive IMV, pneumothorax led to nearly twice the mortality (aHR, 1.99; 95% CI, 1.56-2.54). Increased mortality was also noted when pneumothorax occurred before IMV (aHR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.11-1.69) and within 7 days of hospital admission (aHR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.29-1.98). Conclusion: The overall incidence of pneumothorax in patients hospitalized for COVID-19 was low. Pneumothorax is an independent risk factor for death.

5.
Andrology ; 10(6): 1057-1066, 2022 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1819874

ABSTRACT

IMPORTANCE: Low testosterone levels in males have been linked with increase in proinflammatory cytokines-a primary culprit in COVID-19 disease progression-and with adverse COVID-19 outcomes. To date, however, no published studies have assessed the effect of testosterone therapy on COVID-19 outcomes in older men. OBJECTIVE: To examine whether testosterone therapy reduced disease progression in older men diagnosed with COVID-19. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Nested within a national cohort of older (aged ≥50 years) male patients diagnosed with COVID-19 between January 1, 2020 and July 1, 2021 from the Optum electronic health record COVID-19 database, two matched case-control studies of COVID-19 outcomes were conducted. Cases-defined, respectively, as persons who (a) were hospitalized ≤30 days after COVID-19 diagnosis (n = 33,380), and (b) were admitted to the intensive care unit or received mechanical ventilation during their COVID-19 hospitalization (n = 10,273)-were matched 1:1 with controls based on demographic and clinical factors. EXPOSURES: Testosterone therapy was defined based on receipt of prescription at ≤60, ≤90, or ≤120 days before COVID-19 diagnosis. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for the risk of hospitalization within 30 days of COVID-19 diagnosis and intensive care unit admission/mechanical ventilation during COVID-19 hospitalization. RESULTS: The use of testosterone therapy was not associated with decreased odds of hospitalization (≤60 days: OR = 0.92, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.70-1.20; ≤90 days: OR = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.68-1.13; ≤120 days: OR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.72-1.32) or intensive care unit admission/mechanical ventilation (≤60 days: OR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.37-1.23; ≤90 days: OR = 0.63, 95% CI = 0.36-0.11; ≤120 days: OR = 0.58, 95% CI = 0.29-1.19). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This study showed that testosterone therapy was not associated with decreased risks of COVID-19 adverse outcomes. These findings may provide clinically relevant information regarding testosterone treatment in older men with COVID-19 and other respiratory viral infections with similar pathogenesis.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Aged , COVID-19 Testing , Disease Progression , Humans , Male , SARS-CoV-2 , Testosterone/therapeutic use
6.
Cureus ; 14(2): e21879, 2022 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1716113

ABSTRACT

Background Cardiovascular complications from COVID-19 include myocarditis, acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, and others. Population-level data is lacking about the relationship between COVID-19 and cardiovascular complications; therefore, we conducted a study to examine the incidence of myocarditis, acute myocardial infarction (AMI), heart failure (HF) after COVID-19 infection. Methods Retrospective cohort study using de-identified data from 50 health systems across the United States. Cohort groups were created using patients ≥18 who were admitted to hospitals for respiratory illness with COVID-19 in 2020 and respiratory illness without COVID-19 for 2020 and 2019. There were 107,699 patients with COVID-19, 77,499 patients with respiratory illness in 2020, and 112,898 patients in 2019. The COVID-19 group was matched to each respiratory illness group by propensity score. Patients with prior specific cardiovascular events such as myocarditis, AMI, HF were excluded. The primary outcome was myocarditis, and secondary outcomes were AMI and HF. Results In the COVID-19 group, 79 (0.12%) patients had new-onset myocarditis compared to 29 (0.04%) patients in the non-COVID-19 control (Pneumonia/flu) group Odd's Ratio (OR), (OR 2.73, CI 95%, 1.78-4.18). In the COVID-19 group, 1512 patients developed HF compared to 2,659 patients in the non-COVID-19 group (OR 0.49, CI 95%, 0.46-0.52). 1125 patients in COVID-19 group had AMI compared to 1243 patients in non-COVID-19 group (OR 0.87, CI 95%, 0.80-0.94). Conclusion COVID-19 was associated with a 2-3-fold higher risk of myocarditis. Unexpectedly, lower rates of HF diagnosis reflect challenges faced due to the severity of lung disease leading to obscuring physical exam findings required for HF diagnosis and early mortality before a diagnosis of HF was made.

7.
Clin Infect Dis ; 73(9): e3261-e3265, 2021 11 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1501030

ABSTRACT

We describe 4 cases of Chlamydia psittaci pneumonia among medical staff in a coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) screening ward, as well as the experience of dealing with this nosocomial infection event. Atypical pneumonia, in addition to COVID-19, should be considered when clustering cases occur, even during a COVID-19 pneumonia pandemic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Chlamydophila psittaci , Pneumonia, Mycoplasma , Chlamydophila psittaci/genetics , Cluster Analysis , Humans , SARS-CoV-2
8.
JAMA Netw Open ; 4(10): e2131012, 2021 10 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1482078

ABSTRACT

Importance: The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and associated mitigation measures have disrupted access to psychiatric medications, particularly for women. Objective: To assess the sex differences in trends in the prescribing of benzodiazepines, Z-hypnotics and serotonergic (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors [SSRIs] and serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors [SNRIs]), which are commonly prescribed for anxiety, insomnia, and depression. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used data from Clinformatics Data Mart, one of the largest commercial health insurance databases in the US. Enrollees 18 years or older were required to have complete enrollment in a given month during our study period, January 1, 2018, to March 31, 2021, to be included for that month. Main Outcomes and Measures: Prescription of a benzodiazepine, Z-hypnotic, or SSRI or SNRI. For each month, the percentage of patients with benzodiazepine, Z-hypnotic, or SSRI or SNRI prescriptions by sex was calculated. Results: The records of 17 255 033 adults (mean [SD] age, 51.7 [19.5] years; 51.3% female) were examined in 2018, 17 340 731 adults (mean [SD] age, 52.5 [19.7] years; 51.6% female) in 2019, 16 916 910 adults (mean [SD] age, 53.7 [19.8] years; 51.9% female) in 2020, and 15 135 998 adults (mean [SD] age, 56.2 [19.8] years; 52.5% female) in 2021. Compared with men, women had a higher rate of prescriptions for all 3 drugs classes and had larger changes in prescription rates over time. Benzodiazepine prescribing decreased from January 2018 (women: 5.61%; 95% CI, 5.60%-5.63%; men: 3.03%; 95% CI, 3.02%-3.04%) to March 2021 (women: 4.91%; 95% CI, 4.90%-4.93%; men: 2.66%; 95% CI, 2.65%-2.67%), except for a slight increase in April 2020 among women. Z-hypnotic prescribing increased from January 2020 for women (1.39%; 95% CI, 1.38%-1.40%) and February 2020 for men (0.97%; 95% CI, 0.96%-0.98%) to October 2020 (women: 1.46%; 95% CI, 1.46%-1.47%; men: 1.00%; 95% CI, 0.99%-1.01%). Prescribing of SSRIs and SNRIs increased from January 2018 (women: 12.77%; 95% CI; 12.75%-12.80%; men: 5.56%; 95% CI, 5.44%-5.58%) to April 2020 for men (6.73%; 95% CI, 6.71%-6.75%) and October 2020 for women (15.18%; 95% CI, 15.16%-15.21%). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, coinciding with the COVID-19 pandemic onset was an increase in Z-hypnotic as well as SSRI and SNRI prescriptions in both men and women along with an increase in benzodiazepine prescriptions in women, findings that suggest a substantial mental health impact of COVID-19-associated mitigation measures.


Subject(s)
Benzodiazepines/therapeutic use , COVID-19/psychology , Hypnotics and Sedatives/therapeutic use , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Serotonin and Noradrenaline Reuptake Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Adult , Aged , COVID-19/epidemiology , Databases, Factual , Female , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , Sex Distribution
9.
Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis ; 8(4): 517-527, 2021 Oct 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1456561

ABSTRACT

RATIONALE: There is controversy concerning the association of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) as an independent risk factor for mortality in patients hospitalized with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). We hypothesize that patients with COPD hospitalized for COVID-19 have increased mortality risk. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether COPD increased the risk of mortality among patients hospitalized for COVID-19. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of patients with COVID-19 between February 10, 2020, and November 10, 2020, and hospitalized within 14 days of diagnosis. Electronic health records from U.S. facilities (Optum COVID-19 data) were used. RESULTS: In our cohort of 31,526 patients, 3030 (9.6%) died during hospitalization. Mortality in patients with COPD was higher than that of patients without COPD, 14.02% and 8.8%, respectively. Univariate (odds ratio [OR] 1.68; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.54 to 1.84) and multivariate (OR 1.33; 95% CI 1.18 to 1.50) analysis showed that patients with COPD had greater odds of death due to COVID-19 than patients without COPD. We found significant interactions between COPD and sex and COPD and age. Specifically, the increased mortality risk associated with COPD was observed among female (OR 1.62; 95% CI 1.36 to 1.95) but not male patients (OR 1.14; 95% CI 0.97 to 1.34); and in patients aged 40 to 64 (OR 1.42; 95% CI 1.07 to 1.90) and 65 to 79 (OR 1.48; 95% CI 1.23 to 1.78) years. CONCLUSIONS: COPD is an independent risk factor for death in adults aged 40 to 79 years hospitalized with COVID-19 infection.

10.
Acta Pharmacol Sin ; 43(4): 1072-1081, 2022 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1285959

ABSTRACT

Jingyin granules, a marketed antiviral herbal medicine, have been recommended for treating H1N1 influenza A virus infection and Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in China. To fight viral diseases in a more efficient way, Jingyin granules are frequently co-administered in clinical settings with a variety of therapeutic agents, including antiviral drugs, anti-inflammatory drugs, and other Western medicines. However, it is unclear whether Jingyin granules modulate the pharmacokinetics of Western drugs or trigger clinically significant herb-drug interactions. This study aims to assess the inhibitory potency of the herbal extract of Jingyin granules (HEJG) against human drug-metabolizing enzymes and to clarify whether HEJG can modulate the pharmacokinetic profiles of Western drug(s) in vivo. The results clearly demonstrated that HEJG dose-dependently inhibited human CES1A, CES2A, CYPs1A, 2A6, 2C8, 2C9, 2D6, and 2E1; this herbal medicine also time- and NADPH-dependently inhibited human CYP2C19 and CYP3A. In vivo tests showed that HEJG significantly increased the plasma exposure of lopinavir (a CYP3A-substrate drug) by 2.43-fold and strongly prolonged its half-life by 1.91-fold when HEJG (3 g/kg) was co-administered with lopinavir to rats. Further investigation revealed licochalcone A, licochalcone B, licochalcone C and echinatin in Radix Glycyrrhizae, as well as quercetin and kaempferol in Folium Llicis Purpureae, to be time-dependent CYP3A inhibitors. Collectively, our findings reveal that HEJG modulates the pharmacokinetics of CYP substrate-drug(s) by inactivating CYP3A, providing key information for both clinicians and patients to use herb-drug combinations for antiviral therapy in a scientific and reasonable way.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Drug Treatment , Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype , Animals , Antiviral Agents/pharmacology , Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A Inhibitors , Herb-Drug Interactions , Humans , Microsomes, Liver , Rats
12.
researchsquare; 2021.
Preprint in English | PREPRINT-RESEARCHSQUARE | ID: ppzbmed-10.21203.rs.3.rs-296851.v1

ABSTRACT

Background: COVID-19 is a global epidemic posing threat to public health. Without specific drugs and therapies, it is important to evaluate the effectiveness of currently applicable drugs.This study was a retrospective analysis of the effect of the administration of statins on survival in patients with severe COVID-19.Design: This study was a retrospective analysis of data collected in the ICU of Tongji Hospital affiliated with Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology (HUST) during the COVID-19 outbreak.Data from69 patients with severe COVID-19 treated in the ICU from February to March 2020 were collected for the analysis.Patients with severe COVID-19 were treated with the standard of care at the time, and some patients were also treated with statins.Results: Sixty-four patients with complete records were enrolled in the final stage of analysis. Statin administration had a beneficial effect on the overall survival of the patients. The statin administration cohorthad a significantly shorter activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) and prothrombin time (PT) according to t-tests. The aPTT and PT were also stable, as shown by locally weighted smoothing (LOESS) analysis. The use of statins combined with corticosteroids, anti-coagulants and anti-hypertensive drugs had a relatively greater effect on survival.Conclusions: Statins can be therapeutic agents that may promote patient survival, possibly by improving coagulation function. Trial registration: HIRB 2020-1119 September 11th, 2020, retrospectively registered.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hypertension
13.
J Opioid Manag ; 16(6): 401-404, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1022155

ABSTRACT

Based on evidence of the immunosuppressive effects of chronic opioids, long-term users of prescription and illicit opioids comprise an unrecognized but growing population of Americans with compromised immune function and respiratory depression who may be at high risk of infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19)-related hospitalization, prolonged ICU stay, adverse events, and death. This perspective is of broad clinical and public health importance because the US has the highest population of long-term users of prescription opioids, a sequel of a decade-long practice of opioid overprescribing in the US. For long-term opioid users who are hospitalized for COVID-19, clinicians face clinical challenges arising from the suppressive effects of opioids on the respiratory and immune functions, as well as the potential for adverse drug-drug interaction when opioids have to be continued in long-term users. More research is needed to further understand the association of long-term opioid use and susceptibility to COVID-19 and other emerging infections.


Subject(s)
Analgesics, Opioid/adverse effects , COVID-19/complications , Opioid-Related Disorders/complications , Humans , Immunocompromised Host , Respiratory Insufficiency , United States/epidemiology
14.
Psychiatr Serv ; 72(5): 578-581, 2021 05 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-901549

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to examine the impact of substance use disorder on the risk of hospitalization, complications, and mortality among adult patients diagnosed as having COVID-19. METHODS: The authors conducted a propensity score (PS)-matched double-cohort study (N=5,562 in each cohort) with data from the TriNetX Research Network database to identify 54,529 adult patients (≥18 years) diagnosed as having COVID-19 between February 20 and June 30, 2020. RESULTS: Primary analysis (PS matched on demographic characteristics and presence of diabetes and obesity) showed that substance use disorder was associated with an increased risk of hospitalization (odds ratio [OR]=1.84, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.69-2.01), ventilator use (OR=1.45, 95% CI=1.22-1.72), and mortality (OR=1.30, 95% CI=1.08-1.56). CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that COVID-19 patients with substance use disorders are at increased risk for adverse outcomes. The attenuation of ORs in the model that matched for chronic respiratory and cardiovascular diseases associated with substance abuse suggests that the observed risks may be partially mediated by these conditions.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/mortality , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Substance-Related Disorders/epidemiology , COVID-19/epidemiology , Cohort Studies , Comorbidity , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Odds Ratio , Prognosis , Risk Factors , SARS-CoV-2 , Treatment Outcome
15.
Infection ; 48(6): 861-870, 2020 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-680116

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak has become a global public health concern; however, relatively few detailed reports of related cardiac injury are available. The aims of this study were to compare the clinical and echocardiographic characteristics of inpatients in the intensive-care unit (ICU) and non-ICU patients. METHODS: We recruited 416 patients diagnosed with COVID-19 and divided them into two groups: ICU (n = 35) and non-ICU (n = 381). Medical histories, laboratory findings, and echocardiography data were compared. RESULTS: The levels of myocardial injury markers in ICU vs non-ICU patients were as follows: troponin I (0.029 ng/mL [0.007-0.063] vs 0.006 ng/mL [0.006-0.006]) and myoglobin (65.45 µg/L [39.77-130.57] vs 37.00 µg/L [26.40-53.54]). Echocardiographic findings included ventricular wall thickening (12 [39%] vs 1 [4%]), pulmonary hypertension (9 [29%] vs 0 [0%]), and reduced left-ventricular ejection fraction (5 [16%] vs 0 [0%]). Overall, 10% of the ICU patients presented with right heart enlargement, thickened right-ventricular wall, decreased right heart function, and pericardial effusion. Cardiac complications were more common in ICU patients, including acute cardiac injury (21 [60%] vs 13 [3%]) (including 2 cases of fulminant myocarditis), atrial or ventricular tachyarrhythmia (3 [9%] vs 3 [1%]), and acute heart failure (5 [14%] vs 0 [0%]). CONCLUSION: Myocardial injury marker elevation, ventricular wall thickening, pulmonary artery hypertension, and cardiac complications including acute myocardial injury, arrhythmia, and acute heart failure are more common in ICU patients with COVID-19. Cardiac injury in COVID-19 patients may be related more to the systemic response after infection rather than direct damage by coronavirus.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/epidemiology , Heart Diseases/epidemiology , Heart Diseases/etiology , SARS-CoV-2 , Aged , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/virology , China/epidemiology , Comorbidity , Critical Care , Echocardiography , Female , Heart Diseases/diagnosis , Heart Diseases/mortality , Heart Function Tests , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Myocarditis/diagnosis , Myocarditis/epidemiology , Myocarditis/etiology , Prognosis , Radiography, Thoracic , Symptom Assessment
16.
medrxiv; 2020.
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppzbmed-10.1101.2020.03.21.20040121

ABSTRACT

[Background] Since December 2019, a cluster of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) occurred in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China and spread rapidly from China to other countries. In-hospital mortality are high in severe cases and cardiac injury characterized by elevated cardiac troponin are common among them. The mechanism of cardiac injury and the relationship between cardiac injury and in-hospital mortality remained unclear. Studies focused on cardiac injury in COVID-19 patients are scarce. [Objectives] To investigate the association between cardiac injury and in-hospital mortality of patients with confirmed or suspected COVID-19. [Methods] Demographic, clinical, treatment, and laboratory data of consecutive confirmed or suspected COVID-19 patients admitted in Wuhan No.1 Hospital from 25th December, 2019 to 15th February, 2020 were extracted from electronic medical records and were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis were used to explore the risk factors associated with in-hospital death. [Results] A total of 110 patients with confirmed (n=80) or suspected (n=30) COVID-19 were screened and 48 patients (female 31.3%, mean age 70.58{+/-}13.38 year old) among them with high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) test within 48 hours after admission were included, of whom 17 (17/48, 35.4%) died in hospital while 31 (31/48, 64.6%) were discharged or transferred to other hospital. High-sensitivity cardiac troponin I was levated in 13 (13/48, 27.1%) patents. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed pulse oximetry of oxygen saturation (SpO2) on admission (HR 0.704, 95% CI 0.546-0.909, per 1% decrease, p=0.007), elevated hs-cTnI (HR 10.902, 95% 1.279-92.927, p=0.029) and elevated d-dimer (HR 1.103, 95%CI 1.034-1.176, per 1mg/L increase, p=0.003) on admission were independently associated with in-hospital mortality. [Conclusions] Cardiac injury defined by hs-cTnI elevation and elevated d-dimer on admission were risk factors for in-hospital death, while higher SpO2 could be seen as a protective factor, which could help clinicians to identify patients with adverse outcome at the early stage of COVID-19.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections , Heart Diseases
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL